TO THE WHITE HOUSE for its plan to fold most wartime funding into its base Pentagon budget request starting in fiscal 2010. Such a move would be ill-advised for three reasons. First, it makes it easier for Congress to shift tens of billions of defense dollars into pork programs. Second, merging war-related expenses into the regular defense budget would produce distortions and potentially chaos for the base budget, which should be separate so that funding for necessary nonwartime defense programs is properly safeguarded. Third, blending war-related costs into any general funding pot helps disguise the true cost of war. Good policy keeps base defense spending and wartime funding separate to protect the former and reduce the risk of larding the latter.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.” April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan? April 02 2014
Popular Posts
Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
A failure in generalship For the second time in a generation, the United States...
From the Archives
Good advice ROBERT KILLEBREW served more than 30 years in the Army...
Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
About Us Armed Forces Journal Editor's note: AFJ is...
Recent Comments