The indefatigable U.S. ambassador to Iraq — and, lest we forget, previously envoy to Afghanistan — for helping engineer a government of “national unity” in Baghdad and the agreement by which Nuri al-Maliki has become prime minister. We have no illusions that this marks the beginning of the end, or even an end to the American beginning in Iraq, but it is a remarkable step toward a different future for the homeland of Saddam Hussein. Almost as significant, Khalilzad represents a step toward a different relationship between diplomats and soldiers; in both Iraq and Afghanistan, the ambassador has proven himself adept at bridging a divide that is naturally too wide and which was made wider by less talented men. If victory in the long war for the Middle East requires the U.S. to mobilize “all elements of national power,” not simply armed force, it will still require statesmen like Khalilzad who understand the nature and the institutions of the military.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
- Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.” April 29 2014
- Two Cheers for the QDR April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
- Afghanistan or Talibanistan? April 02 2014
Popular Posts
- Truth, lies and Afghanistan I spent last year in Afghanistan, visiting and talking...
- 12 new principles of warfare Now that dramatic improvements in weaponry, communicat...
- Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
- A failure in generalship For the second time in a generation, the United States...
- Purge the generals The U.S. Army’s generals, as a group, have lost ...
- About Us Armed Forces Journal Editor's note: AFJ is...
Recent Comments