Iraq and coming out pointing fingers at our Israel-Palestinian policy. According to the report, the U.S. cannot achieve its goals in the Middle East unless it deals directly with the Arab-Israeli conflict and regional instability. True, America’s credibility in the region would be strengthened if we could get Israel and the Palestinians to ease their standoff and get on with a peace deal. But if this was a strategy to success in Iraq, it needed to be in place in 2002, ahead of the Iraq invasion. To view resolving that intractable, decades-old conflict as a strategic path to solving today’s Iraq crisis attempts to present the obvious as a new idea. We might as well say democracy would flourish in the Middle East if we could eliminate poverty, strong-arm dictators and religious fanaticism.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.” April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan? April 02 2014
Popular Posts
Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
12 new principles of warfare Now that dramatic improvements in weaponry, communicat...
From the Archives
A failure in generalship For the second time in a generation, the United States...
Cyberspace: What is it, where is it and who cares? There continue to be senior leaders in both the private...
Recent Comments