Iraq and coming out pointing fingers at our Israel-Palestinian policy. According to the report, the U.S. cannot achieve its goals in the Middle East unless it deals directly with the Arab-Israeli conflict and regional instability. True, America’s credibility in the region would be strengthened if we could get Israel and the Palestinians to ease their standoff and get on with a peace deal. But if this was a strategy to success in Iraq, it needed to be in place in 2002, ahead of the Iraq invasion. To view resolving that intractable, decades-old conflict as a strategic path to solving today’s Iraq crisis attempts to present the obvious as a new idea. We might as well say democracy would flourish in the Middle East if we could eliminate poverty, strong-arm dictators and religious fanaticism.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
- Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.” April 29 2014
- Two Cheers for the QDR April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
- Afghanistan or Talibanistan? April 02 2014
Popular Posts
- Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
- Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
- Pipeline politics in Syria You can’t understand the conflict without talking about...
- 12 new principles of warfare Now that dramatic improvements in weaponry, communicat...
- From the Archives
- Purge the generals The U.S. Army’s generals, as a group, have lost ...
Recent Comments