Deputy undersecretary of defense and principal QDR point man, one last QDR-related bolt. Proving that the Pentagon’s leadership is still stuck in the transformational past, pre-Sept. 11, Henry presented the review’s force-shrinking decisions “as a blueprint for shaping the force” for the long war in the greater Middle East. “It’s not about [troop] numbers. Numbers don’t tell you if you can get the job done,” he said. On the other hand, we would observe, the lack of numbers isn’t exactly getting the job done, either. The Bush administration has ridiculed arguments to increase the size of the U.S. military, especially the regular Army, as “Napoleonic” thinking. But the emperor’s observation that victory went to the big battalions, and Stalin’s famous dictum about Russian tank production — “Quantity has a quality all its own” — make us wonder whether in this case bigger isn’t better.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
- Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.” April 29 2014
- Two Cheers for the QDR April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
- Afghanistan or Talibanistan? April 02 2014
Popular Posts
- Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
- Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
- Essay: Dumb-dumb bullets Every year, the services spend millions of dollars tea...
- 12 new principles of warfare Now that dramatic improvements in weaponry, communicat...
- Google vs. China TO GOOGLE for its faceoff with China over cyber attack...
- A failure in generalship For the second time in a generation, the United States...
Recent Comments