Deputy undersecretary of defense and principal QDR point man, one last QDR-related bolt. Proving that the Pentagon’s leadership is still stuck in the transformational past, pre-Sept. 11, Henry presented the review’s force-shrinking decisions “as a blueprint for shaping the force” for the long war in the greater Middle East. “It’s not about [troop] numbers. Numbers don’t tell you if you can get the job done,” he said. On the other hand, we would observe, the lack of numbers isn’t exactly getting the job done, either. The Bush administration has ridiculed arguments to increase the size of the U.S. military, especially the regular Army, as “Napoleonic” thinking. But the emperor’s observation that victory went to the big battalions, and Stalin’s famous dictum about Russian tank production — “Quantity has a quality all its own” — make us wonder whether in this case bigger isn’t better.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.” April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan? April 02 2014
Popular Posts
Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
Truth, lies and Afghanistan I spent last year in Afghanistan, visiting and talking...
Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
Perspectives: A French idea worth stealing The U.S. would do well to emulate France in at least o...
A better way to use red teams The past decade has seen the concept of the red team g...
Chasing the Austerlitz ideal At 10 o’clock in the morning Dec. 2, 1805, a few...
Recent Comments