The courtship of India was begun by President Clinton, but the Bush Administration has brought what is potentially the most important strategic partnership of the coming century to the point of consummation. AFJ will examine the pros and cons of the nuclear deal framed during the president’s recent trip to New Delhi in the May issue, but the implications for U.S. strategy go far beyond the particulars of the deal itself. India is one of only a handful of nations who share our strategic concerns about radical Islam and China, who are stable and serious democracies, and who still regard military power as a legitimate tool of statecraft. Despite the compelling logic of the partnership, the president is taking a big political risk in offering nuclear technology to India; without congressional cooperation, the partnership might be stillborn.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
- Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.” April 29 2014
- Two Cheers for the QDR April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
- Afghanistan or Talibanistan? April 02 2014
Popular Posts
- Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
- Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
- Essay: Dumb-dumb bullets Every year, the services spend millions of dollars tea...
- 12 new principles of warfare Now that dramatic improvements in weaponry, communicat...
- Google vs. China TO GOOGLE for its faceoff with China over cyber attack...
- A failure in generalship For the second time in a generation, the United States...
Recent Comments