for his attempt to stonewall the closure of Joint Forces Command. The House Armed Services Readiness Subcommittee chairman inserted into a budget bill a provision that blocks funding for the dismantling of JFCOM unless the Defense Department provides Congress more detailed information on the expected cost savings and consequences. It was a tactic aimed at keeping JFCOM on life support along with many of the private contractor jobs associated with the command, whose headquarters is located in the Virginia Republican’s district. JFCOM’s closure is expected to save around $400 million a year; as a separate command, it’s an organization that has fulfilled its purpose and which is no longer necessary to ensure jointness. Forbes’ maneuver is the classic “not-in-my-backyard” politicking: He voted against the appropriations budget bill, saying the cuts didn’t go deep enough, yet blocked a prudent cost-cutting measure because of the impact on jobs — and votes — in his district.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.”
April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR
April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan?
April 02 2014
Popular Posts
Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
Unmanned naval warfare: Retrospect & prospect Some say unmanned systems will start a revolution in na...
Challenges and choices Since the fall of the Taliban in November 2001, Afghan...
Chasing the Austerlitz ideal At 10 o’clock in the morning Dec. 2, 1805, a few...
Clausewitz and World War IV The essence of every profession is expressed in the wr...
Recent Comments