Deputy assistant secretary of state for “public diplomacy” — we are not making this up — for characterizing what might be described as the “assisted suicides” of three Guantanamo detainees as a “good PR move to draw attention.” Almost as tone-deaf was Rear Adm. Harry Harris’ analysis that the deaths were an act of “asymmetrical warfare.” The underlying point that Graffy and the admiral were attempting to make, that the deaths were much more a political act than the act of desperation that activist lawyers claimed them to be, is certainly true but got lost, thanks to the inept way it was made. Graffy’s gaffe, in particular, was public diplomacy of the most self-defeating sort. The incident, though minor, reinforces our belief that, in the “war of ideas,” the first rule should be to prevent fratricide.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
- Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.” April 29 2014
- Two Cheers for the QDR April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
- Afghanistan or Talibanistan? April 02 2014
Popular Posts
- Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
- Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
- 12 new principles of warfare Now that dramatic improvements in weaponry, communicat...
- Essay: Dumb-dumb bullets Every year, the services spend millions of dollars tea...
- Google vs. China TO GOOGLE for its faceoff with China over cyber attack...
- From the Archives
Recent Comments