TO THE NAVY for cutting funding of its P-8 patrol aircraft program. In the Defense Department’s fiscal 2010 budget proposal, the Navy has requested a shift of more than $900 million from the P-8 patrol and surveillance program to the DDG 1000 destroyer. Such a huge slice could potentially kill the P-8 program. While it’s understandable that a Navy under budget pressures focuses on saving its ships, giving up the P-8 would be shortsighted. The P-3 that the P-8 is designed to replace has in effect worn out; dozens have been grounded, and the Navy is struggling to keep the fleet flying. And yet the P-3 provides critical information over southwest Asia and is the Navy’s most important ISR contributor to the wars and to the joint fight. Further, the P-8 preserves and advances a unique capability while the DDG, with its novel design features, is effectively a massively expensive technology demonstrator. There is a real danger that without the P-8 coming on board as planned, the Navy will give up critical anti-submarine warfare and ISR capabilities.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
- Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.” April 29 2014
- Two Cheers for the QDR April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
- Afghanistan or Talibanistan? April 02 2014
Popular Posts
- Truth, lies and Afghanistan I spent last year in Afghanistan, visiting and talking...
- 12 new principles of warfare Now that dramatic improvements in weaponry, communicat...
- Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
- A failure in generalship For the second time in a generation, the United States...
- Purge the generals The U.S. Army’s generals, as a group, have lost ...
- Hybrid vs. compound war Over the past two years, the hybrid threat construct h...
Recent Comments