TO THE NAVY for cutting funding of its P-8 patrol aircraft program. In the Defense Department’s fiscal 2010 budget proposal, the Navy has requested a shift of more than $900 million from the P-8 patrol and surveillance program to the DDG 1000 destroyer. Such a huge slice could potentially kill the P-8 program. While it’s understandable that a Navy under budget pressures focuses on saving its ships, giving up the P-8 would be shortsighted. The P-3 that the P-8 is designed to replace has in effect worn out; dozens have been grounded, and the Navy is struggling to keep the fleet flying. And yet the P-3 provides critical information over southwest Asia and is the Navy’s most important ISR contributor to the wars and to the joint fight. Further, the P-8 preserves and advances a unique capability while the DDG, with its novel design features, is effectively a massively expensive technology demonstrator. There is a real danger that without the P-8 coming on board as planned, the Navy will give up critical anti-submarine warfare and ISR capabilities.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.”
April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR
April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan?
April 02 2014
Popular Posts
Google vs. China TO GOOGLE for its faceoff with China over cyber attack...
Challenges and choices Since the fall of the Taliban in November 2001, Afghan...
Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
Why senior military leaders fail In the first decade of the 21st century, the U.S. mili...
Hybrid vs. compound war Over the past two years, the hybrid threat construct h...
Recent Comments