TO THE ARMY for getting its plan for a new Ground Combat Vehicle stuck in a rut. The Army’s request for proposals for the GCV was due out in mid-February, but reports of delays surfaced instead. The Army is apparently at loggerheads with Pentagon officials over the GCV’s weight, design and cost. The Defense Department last year canceled the Future Combat System family of vehicles over similar fundamentals. In making that announcement, however, Defense Secretary Robert Gates acknowledged that the Army must have a modernized fleet of combat vehicles, and he pledged to protect FCS vehicles funding in the hope that the Army would be ready to move forward this year on a new program. But the Army can’t seem to get a handle on what it wants: easily deployable or highly survivable. If it doesn’t soon get its head around that dichotomy, the Army runs the risk of losing its second chance and seeing the vehicle program canceled for good.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
- Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.” April 29 2014
- Two Cheers for the QDR April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
- Afghanistan or Talibanistan? April 02 2014
Popular Posts
- Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
- Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
- 12 new principles of warfare Now that dramatic improvements in weaponry, communicat...
- Google vs. China TO GOOGLE for its faceoff with China over cyber attack...
- From the Archives
- Essay: Dumb-dumb bullets Every year, the services spend millions of dollars tea...
Recent Comments