To the Obama administration for the ambiguous declaratory policy in its Nuclear Posture Review. If there’s one thing a nuclear-armed superpower should be clear on, it’s the circumstances in which it may use those weapons. An unambiguous declaratory statement is critical to the core strategic mission of deterrence that our nuclear forces perform. The new policy, however, is so littered with exceptions and caveats that neither our enemies nor our allies can be clear on the circumstances that would compel the U.S. to push the button. If North Korea and Iran believe the U.S. must now consult a host of lawyers to determine compliance with its own nuclear strike policy, then America has weakened itself. And if our non-nuclear partners are similarly unsure on where the U.S. stands, then Obama may have inadvertently opened the gate to greater nuclear proliferation.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
- Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.” April 29 2014
- Two Cheers for the QDR April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
- Afghanistan or Talibanistan? April 02 2014
Popular Posts
- Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
- Truth, lies and Afghanistan I spent last year in Afghanistan, visiting and talking...
- 12 new principles of warfare Now that dramatic improvements in weaponry, communicat...
- Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
- Hybrid vs. compound war Over the past two years, the hybrid threat construct h...
- Good advice ROBERT KILLEBREW served more than 30 years in the Army...
Recent Comments