To the Pentagon for making the job of leading the new Cyber Command an adjunct to heading the National Security Agency. Gen. Keith Alexander has the skills and the expertise for either job. But having a single chief running both organizations raises problems. First, it implies that the cyber role is not important enough for a full-time chief. Second, it raises the question of whether the command was created to militarize cyberspace, even though Alexander denies this. Third, there’s the legal gray area that this type of policy/military double-hat position crosses. Cybersecurity is a growing threat while traditional terrorism remains a constant, 24/7 threat to U.S. national security. The chief overseeing each vital mission should be dedicated to a single duty, not juggling the two.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.”
April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR
April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan?
April 02 2014
Popular Posts
Google vs. China TO GOOGLE for its faceoff with China over cyber attack...
Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
Challenges and choices Since the fall of the Taliban in November 2001, Afghan...
Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
Why senior military leaders fail In the first decade of the 21st century, the U.S. mili...
Hybrid vs. compound war Over the past two years, the hybrid threat construct h...
Recent Comments