If warlords cared about etymological niceties, they might be the first to decry the mutation of their evocative title into a bland bureacratic “ism.” These guys aren’t political theorists; they’re the commanders of the roughest gangs of local tough guys and the modern incarnation of feudal lords.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.”
April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR
April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan?
April 02 2014
Popular Posts
A failure in generalship For the second time in a generation, the United States...- Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
- Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
- “Fiasco” By the winter of 2003-04, the Marine Corps was ordered...
- Hybrid vs. compound war Over the past two years, the hybrid threat construct h...
- The humble leader In the fall of 2009, the National Defense University (...