TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT, for its contrary Iran policy. State officials say they are committed to a diplomatic solution to pressure Iran to change its behavior on the nuclear issue. But the “diplomacy” they offer — negotiations with preconditions — is, by definition, undiplomatic. State representatives Jeffery Feltmann and Patricia McNerney, during a Senate hearing, said Iran had been presented with a “stark choice between two paths: confrontation and isolation; or cooperation and reward.” This offer has isolated Iran, for sure. But it also has isolated the U.S., which now has no eyes or ears within Iran. Asked about recent elections in Iran, Feltmann admitted: “We don’t know what’s going on inside Iran because we don’t have anyone there.” Defense Secretary Robert Gates remarked in his confirmation hearings that during the Cold War, the U.S. still maintained a dialogue with the Soviet Union. Almost 30 years of silence toward Iran has not worked; it’s time to talk.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.” April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan? April 02 2014
Popular Posts
Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
War planning for wicked problems There is increasing awareness within the Defense Depar...
12 new principles of warfare Now that dramatic improvements in weaponry, communicat...
Peters’ “Blood borders” map On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
From the Archives
Truth, lies and Afghanistan I spent last year in Afghanistan, visiting and talking...
Recent Comments