TO CONGRESS. For all Washington’s talk of Pentagon acquisition reform, congressmen from both sides of the house immediately ignored the steps this budget takes toward that goal and rushed to protect multibillion dollar programs in their constituencies. So much for spending control. As Gates said, it’s one thing to speak of reform; quite another to make the tough choices that reform demands. Also disgraceful were the false cries of “defense cuts.” Fact: The 2010 proposal of $534 billion represents a 4 percent increase over the 2009 budget. If congressmen were truly as interested in getting the best deal for soldiers, sailors and airmen as they were in bringing federal cash to their districts, they’d laud the substantial increase in money this budget allocates to supporting them directly.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.”
April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR
April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan?
April 02 2014
Popular Posts
Google vs. China TO GOOGLE for its faceoff with China over cyber attack...
Blood borders International borders are never completely just. But t...
Essay: Dumb-dumb bullets Every year, the services spend millions of dollars tea...
A failure in generalship For the second time in a generation, the United States...
About Us Armed Forces Journal
Editor's note: AFJ is...
Hybrid vs. compound war Over the past two years, the hybrid threat construct h...
Recent Comments