The indefatigable U.S. ambassador to Iraq — and, lest we forget, previously envoy to Afghanistan — for helping engineer a government of “national unity” in Baghdad and the agreement by which Nuri al-Maliki has become prime minister. We have no illusions that this marks the beginning of the end, or even an end to the American beginning in Iraq, but it is a remarkable step toward a different future for the homeland of Saddam Hussein. Almost as significant, Khalilzad represents a step toward a different relationship between diplomats and soldiers; in both Iraq and Afghanistan, the ambassador has proven himself adept at bridging a divide that is naturally too wide and which was made wider by less talented men. If victory in the long war for the Middle East requires the U.S. to mobilize “all elements of national power,” not simply armed force, it will still require statesmen like Khalilzad who understand the nature and the institutions of the military.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.”
April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR
April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan?
April 02 2014
Popular Posts
-
Google vs. China
TO GOOGLE for its faceoff with China over cyber attacks...
-
The Russian Navy revitalized
he Russian Navy today is not nearly as powerful as its...
-
Blood borders
International borders are never completely just. But th...
-
1941: The day before Pearl Harbor
From the archive: December 6, 1941 Editor's note: The d...
-
Updating close-air support
When Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal took command of Afgha...
-
Peters’ “Blood borders” map
On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
Recent Comments