TO THE PENTAGON for its decision to replace the Iraqi military’s AK47 assault rifle with the M16 and M4. The stated reason is that the switch came at the request of the Iraqis. But there’s a logic gap here. The M16 and M4 are more complex weapons that require additional training and maintenance. The AK, though a simpler weapon, is more reliable in conditions where training, care and maintenance might be less than ideal. Moreover, parts and ammunition for the ubiquitous AK are far more easily available. But it’s the AK’s ubiquity that may point to the Pentagon’s true reasoning for the switch. An M16 is far easier to spot if it gets in the wrong hands. With the Government Accountability Office’s recent report highlighting that the Pentagon has lost track of more than 100,000 US-supplied AKs meant for Iraqi security forces, the swap to a more traceable rifle might have seemed smart. But the fledgling Iraqi military lacks the discipline to effectively maintain these weapons.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.”
April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR
April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan?
April 02 2014
Popular Posts
-
Google vs. China
TO GOOGLE for its faceoff with China over cyber attacks...
-
Hybrid vs. compound war
Over the past two years, the hybrid threat construct ha...
-
Blood borders
International borders are never completely just. But th...
-
Understanding the CIA
Since President Harry S. Truman created the CIA with th...
-
Peters’ “Blood borders” map
On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
-
“Fiasco”
By the winter of 2003-04, the Marine Corps was ordered...
Recent Comments