To the Army for pushing into production systems it knows don’t work. After the Future Combat Systems’ program was canceled last year, the Army worked to salvage some high-tech spinouts from the wreckage. But tests have so far shown major performance and reliability issues with most of these systems. The Non-Line-Of-Sight System, for example, misses its target 50 percent of the time and an urban unattended ground sensor provided little data of use. The Army continues to purchase spinout technologies, however, and move them to initial production. This year alone, the Army will spend $682 million buying FCS spinouts. The justification given is that innovative new systems, even when they don’t work, can be tested and adapted in the field. This flips the 80 percent solution concept on its head. It makes sense to get needed equipment, even if it’s less than perfect, to soldiers in war zones as quickly as possible. But it’s a waste of funding and manpower resources to deploy 20 percent solutions in the hope that the soldier can work a fix.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.”
April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR
April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan?
April 02 2014
Popular Posts
-
Google vs. China
TO GOOGLE for its faceoff with China over cyber attacks...
-
Understanding the CIA
Since President Harry S. Truman created the CIA with th...
-
Blood borders
International borders are never completely just. But th...
-
Peters’ “Blood borders” map
On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
-
Hybrid vs. compound war
Over the past two years, the hybrid threat construct ha...
-
The danger of déjà vu
During the past year, we have seen our U.S. national se...
Recent Comments