To Gen. Norton Schwartz. By responding to Paul Kane’s New York Times op-ed that called for the disbanding of the Air Force, the chief of staff added credibility to Kane’s unscrupulous rant. For sure, Kane’s statement that the Air Force is not at war is an outrageous lie, deeply offensive to the hundreds of thousands of airmen who have deployed since 2001, providing countless vital, life-saving missions while also losing 45 of their comrades in combat and more than 500 wounded. And shame on the Times for publishing an article that did not build a reasoned case for its provocative statements or support them with facts. But the author of this nonsense is a retired Marine with no expertise in airpower or authority to comment on the criticality of the Air Force. Instead of rising unnecessarily to the defense of the Air Force, Schwartz should have treated this op-ed with the contempt it deserved. His silent dismissal would have been the stronger statement.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.”
April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR
April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan?
April 02 2014
Popular Posts
-
Google vs. China
TO GOOGLE for its faceoff with China over cyber attacks...
-
Understanding the CIA
Since President Harry S. Truman created the CIA with th...
-
Blood borders
International borders are never completely just. But th...
-
The Russian Navy revitalized
he Russian Navy today is not nearly as powerful as its...
-
Peters’ “Blood borders” map
On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
-
No silver bullets
Along with impatience, a great American weakness is our...
Recent Comments