To the Obama administration for the ambiguous declaratory policy in its Nuclear Posture Review. If there’s one thing a nuclear-armed superpower should be clear on, it’s the circumstances in which it may use those weapons. An unambiguous declaratory statement is critical to the core strategic mission of deterrence that our nuclear forces perform. The new policy, however, is so littered with exceptions and caveats that neither our enemies nor our allies can be clear on the circumstances that would compel the U.S. to push the button. If North Korea and Iran believe the U.S. must now consult a host of lawyers to determine compliance with its own nuclear strike policy, then America has weakened itself. And if our non-nuclear partners are similarly unsure on where the U.S. stands, then Obama may have inadvertently opened the gate to greater nuclear proliferation.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.”
April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR
April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan?
April 02 2014
Popular Posts
-
Google vs. China
TO GOOGLE for its faceoff with China over cyber attacks...
-
Blood borders
International borders are never completely just. But th...
-
Hybrid vs. compound war
Over the past two years, the hybrid threat construct ha...
-
12 new principles of warfare
Now that dramatic improvements in weaponry, communicati...
-
Lessons from Rhino LZ
Shortly after 9 p.m. on Dec. 6, 2001, machine-gun fire...
-
Truth, lies and Afghanistan
I spent last year in Afghanistan, visiting and talking...
Recent Comments