TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT, for its contrary Iran policy. State officials say they are committed to a diplomatic solution to pressure Iran to change its behavior on the nuclear issue. But the “diplomacy” they offer — negotiations with preconditions — is, by definition, undiplomatic. State representatives Jeffery Feltmann and Patricia McNerney, during a Senate hearing, said Iran had been presented with a “stark choice between two paths: confrontation and isolation; or cooperation and reward.” This offer has isolated Iran, for sure. But it also has isolated the U.S., which now has no eyes or ears within Iran. Asked about recent elections in Iran, Feltmann admitted: “We don’t know what’s going on inside Iran because we don’t have anyone there.” Defense Secretary Robert Gates remarked in his confirmation hearings that during the Cold War, the U.S. still maintained a dialogue with the Soviet Union. Almost 30 years of silence toward Iran has not worked; it’s time to talk.
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- 1930: In case you missed it August 09 2014
-
Book excerpt: “F.I.R.E.”
April 29 2014
-
Two Cheers for the QDR
April 06 2014
- 1973: Buy our drones! April 05 2014
-
Afghanistan or Talibanistan?
April 02 2014
Popular Posts
-
Google vs. China
TO GOOGLE for its faceoff with China over cyber attacks...
-
Blood borders
International borders are never completely just. But th...
-
The Russian Navy revitalized
he Russian Navy today is not nearly as powerful as its...
-
1941: The day before Pearl Harbor
From the archive: December 6, 1941 Editor's note: The d...
-
Updating close-air support
When Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal took command of Afgha...
-
Peters’ “Blood borders” map
On Sept. 29, veteran foreign-affairs reporter Robin Wri...
Recent Comments