Darts and Laurels
subscribe  |    email  |    print
To the U.S. Army

For not being “an institution at war.” Our reporting here is anecdotal, to be sure, but the pile of war stories is immense from soldiers and commanders deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan that the institutional Army continues to operate with a peacetime mentality and rules. Staff jobs in Afghanistan, for example, are not “coded” as joint-duty assignments, so talented senior officers are often kept behind desks rather than sent to the front.

Indeed, the problem probably extends beyond the Army. Many parts of the Defense Department seem not to be “at war” or to have a proper sense of urgency about winning the actual fights we’re in; certainly the secretary of defense’s unwillingness to increase the number of active-duty ground forces suggests as much. But given that the burdens of Iraq and Afghanistan fall disproportionately on the Army, Big Green’s internal problems are inexcusable.

  email  |    print  |    continue the debate
YOUR VIEWS
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Read our letters to the editor.
SEND A LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Tell us what you think.
HOW TO SUBMIT AN ARTICLE TO AFJ
Interested in writing an opinion piece for the magazine? Read our guidelines
Subscribe  |  Renew  |  Customer Service  |  Advertising  |  Contact Us
For inquiries about reproduction or distribution of any materials contained herein, please click here.
Gannett
All content © 2012, Armed Forces Journal